The attorneys at Allen, Flatt, Ballidis and Leslie add blog posts regularly to our website.  We cover topics that are important to Southern California accident victims.  Visit this page frequently to read our newest blog posts about bicycle accidents, truck accidents, car accidents, dog bites and other events that injure people throughout Orange County, Los Angeles County, San Diego County, San Bernardino County, Riverside County, Kern County and Ventura County.

Blog

Motorcycle Accidents

Bicycle Accidents

Dog Bite

Auto and Car Accidents

Truck Accident

Pedestrian Accident

Wrongful Death

General

Southern California Injury Law Blog

View More

News

Library

Motorcycle Accidents

Bicycle Accidents

Dog Bite

Auto and Car Accidents

Truck Accident

Pedestrian Accident

Wrongful Death

Lawsuit process

Injury

General

View More

Orange County Accident Lawyer Blog

Our blog posts are added regularly to our website and cover topics that are important to Southern California accident victims.  Visit this page frequently to read our lawyers newest blog posts about bicycle accidents, truck accidents, car accidents, dog bites and other events that injure people throughout Orange County, Los Angeles County, San Diego County, San Bernardino County, Riverside County, Kern County and Ventura County.
Blog Category:

Auto and Car Accidents

2/19/2010
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Elderly man drives into casino killing two.

Auto accidents are common in California, but not quite like this one. An elderly man ran his car into a casino killing two. Read why!

10/7/2009
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Auto accident victims receive compensation from swerving vehicle ahead of them, causing a rear-end collision.

On Monday, October 5, 2009, justice was delivered to a couple involved in an accident on a Southern California freeway, when their cases settled before trial for $762,000.  It was, however, anything but easy to secure that settlement.

The Los Angeles auto accident attorney firm of Allen, Flatt, Ballidis & Leslie successfully argued that two vehicles caused the accident which led to significant injury for the couple. 

The accident arose when a vehicle ahead of the claimants suddenly lost control, swerving across lanes of the freeway.  The claimants were able to slow their vehicle and avoid any contact with the swerving car ahead.  However, they were rear-ended.  Unfortunately, the vehicles had inadequate insurance to cover the damages of both clients.  Therefore, effort was made to place liability on the swerving vehicle, even though there was no contact between them, and the police report did not assess liability against that vehicle.

California law assesses liability to all drivers that are a “substantial factor” in bringing about a collision.  The swerving vehicle driver’s insurance company argued that their driver lost control to avoid another vehicle, and since the claimants were able to reasonably slow to avoid contact, their driver was not liable. They further pointed out that the rear-ending driver was driving too close and inattentive, which were the principal causes of the collision and injury. 

Claimants' attorneys were able to refute these claims by noting that had the swerving vehicle been operated carefully to begin with, the sequence of events would not have occurred.  Further, experts noted that the swerving vehicle robbed the rear-ending driver of reaction time by creating an emergency situation and therefore liability should be assessed against that front car driver.  Both parties prepared for trial, but after expert depositions on damages and liability, the insurance company for the swerving driver agreed to settlement of the claims.

Allen, Flatt, Ballidis & Leslie are Los Angeles auto accident lawyers.  If you need help securing medical treatment, recovering for your damages and wage loss, please call us at 1 866-981-5596  to discuss your needs.

We promise you will never regret your call.

10/7/2009
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Is 1 year in jail enough time for vehicular manslaughter arising from drunk driving?

In Los Angeles County Superior Court, a drunk driver was sentenced to one year in jail for an incident occurring in January 2008. Roger Avery pleaded guilty to vehicular manslaughter when he was intoxicated and wrapped his automobile around a tree at 100 miles an hour. In his car was his friend Andreas Zini along with Avery's wife. Mr. Zini died in the collision and the family apparently received a civil judgment or settlement award of $4.1 million.

Mr. Avery was also given five years of probation. The important question to ask is whether the amount of jail time was sufficient to send a strong message to drunk drivers.

In every case, the driver is always remorseful, reflecting the lack of appreciation for the potential injury. As Mr. Avery stated “This accident profoundly altered me to the very core of my being.”  Of course this does little to reverse the effects of the accident.

Drunk driving deaths are continuing to occur needlessly, and very little has changed with the prosecution of people associated with such collisions. One year of jail time for drunk driving and causing a death seems sufficient for a prominent citizen in the community, but does it really send the right message for all who will climb behind a wheel in the future? 

Our society is not made up of children that cannot determine risk, but adults with discernment.  We should understand the consequences of our behavior. This California personal injury attorney is of the opinion that more jail time was warranted, because not only was Mr. Avery impaired, but he was traveling at such a high rate of speed, an accident was likely to occur. 

Avery is famous for writing Pulp Fiction, the screenplay directed by Quentin Tarantino. Maybe during his year of incarceration he can write a screenplay that will profoundly change, to the very core, the mind of each every person seated in his next movie about the deaths caused by drunk drivers.

James Ballidis is a California personal injury attorney specializing in Los Angeles and Orange County automobile accidents. You can call our firm for your accident needs at 1-866-981-5596.

9/30/2009
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Toyota is accused of destroying evidence in rollover cases. We always suspected it, says a California personal injury attorney.

According to a new CBS news investigation, a former prominent attorney with Toyota has charged his past company, Toyota Motor Sales, USA Inc of withholding critical evidence involving pick-ups and SUV’s with poorly designed roofs. Dimitrios P. Biller alleges that his former employer illegally withheld evidence in several rollover lawsuits.
Biller claims that he was instructed to keep silent and even destroy documents needed in product liability lawsuits against Toyota. Additionally he claims that the engineering unit destroyed documents for over 300 roof-crash type rollover accident cases.

Since this important safety information is now known, several attorneys have filed to reopen at least 17 major cases and it could impact up to 300 more across the country. Several of these cases occurred in California, including Los Angeles and Orange Counties.  Most California Auto Accident attorneys suspect this type of behavior goes on, but how to prove it is always difficult. It is nice to have one of them break rank because it is the right thing to do!

Do you know someone who has been severely injured in a Toyota rollover accident? The model that was mostly affected was the Toyota 4Runner SUV. Contact an experienced California personal injury attorney immediately for a free consultation. Allen, Flatt, Ballidis and Leslie have been serving the Orange County community since 1974.

Pedestrian Accident

10/8/2009
Connie Gray
Comments (0)

Distracted Orange County driver hits pedestrian while texting

Last week, While our nation’s leaders were discussing the dangers of distracted driving, a Costa Mesa driver was ordered to stand trial for vehicular manslaughter with gross negligence.  The driver hit a woman in a cross walk only moments after texting on his cell phone.
 
Martha Ovalle was killed while crossing the street on a marked crosswalk in Newport Beach in August of last year.  Ms. Ovalle was a Guatemalan immigrant who worked as a nanny. She was hit by Martin Burt Kuehl, age 42.
 
Phone records show that Kuehl had been texting for at least 30 minutes before the accident. A witness to the accident said that the driver behind Kuehl had to honk to alert him to the green light.
 
Texting while driving is illegal in California and lawmakers are considering a nation-wide ban.  Texting and cell phone use are growing contributors to distracted driving.  Distracted driving is a factor in nearly 80 percent of traffic accidents and 12 percent of traffic fatalities.
 
When distracted drivers are on the road, no one is safe.  If you or someone you love has been injured or killed because of distracted driving, an experienced attorney can help.  The attorneys at Allen, Flatt, Ballidis and Leslie specialize in car wrecks and pedestrian accidents.  Contact us at 949-752-7474 or toll free at 866-981-5596 for a free consultation.


Wrongful Death

2/4/2010
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Doctor gets away with murder by paying $250,000.

MICRA damages limit this doctor to a payment of $250,000 for manslaughter or murder of a 20 year old woman.

2/4/2010
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Doctor gets away with murder by paying $250,000.

MICRA damages limit this doctor to a payment of $250,000 for manslaughter or murder of a 20 year old woman.

Southern California Injury Law Blog

    Last week an Orange County jury awarded $3.1 million to a woman who suffered a medication overdose at a skilled nursing home that left her brain damaged. Barbara Lefforge, only 57 years old was sent to St. Edna’s center for rehabilitation after a tendon repair surgery. She had only been there 5 ½ hours when the medication error occurred, explained an Orange County injury attorney.

    According to court records, after her surgery her doctor recommended that she stay at St. Edna’s skilled nursing facility until she recuperated. She was mistakenly given 50mg of morphine instead of 50mg of Demerol. Since this was such an excessive dose, Lefforge’s attorney argued that medical personnel should have questioned that dosage order. Moreover the staff pharmacist even warned that the dosage was too high, but Lefforge’s doctor had doubled it, so she was given that quantity of medication.

    Lefforge was left unmonitored until the next morning when she was found barely breathing due to the medication error. She had suffered from a major overdose of morphine. After being taken to the hospital, it was established that she had suffered a brain injury from the excessive morphine dose.

    St. Edna Rehabilitation Center is one of 25 California rehab facilities owned by Covenant Care. Since 2004, they have accepted more than $880 million in additional compensation from the state for increased wages and staffing. According to the non-profit group, “California Watch”, it found that many Covenant Care facilities actually reduced their staff and let nursing ratios go below state standards during this time.

    Tragically this is not an isolated case. Nearly one in five dosing orders of all nursing homes and hospitals has medication errors. These odds are unacceptable. In many cases, these patients are there for short stays while rehabilitating, not lifelong residents. It is for this reason that every citizen should have an up-to-date medical directive.

    Only about 20% of Americans have a medical directive document; however, explained an Orange County injury attorney, it is one of the most important documents a person can have. The Advanced Health Care Directive is the best way to make known your health care wishes if you are incapacitated and can’t communicate your wishes.

    Unfortunately, just telling your wishes to your husband or wife does not automatically ensure that they will be honored. Here in California, the law gives you two options for your directive: you can either appoint another person who can make the decisions for you or you can make your desires known through writing your own advanced directive. Either way, it’s important to meet with a professional lawyer to discuss your legal options.

    If you have a loved one in any type of nursing facility, it would be wise to double-check that their medical directive matches the instructions that the staff has. If you have any questions or concerns regarding a nursing home in California, visit www.nursinghomeguide.org/ for a complete listing by city or county of local elder facilities and their violations, staffing policies, and complaints.

    James Ballidis is an Orange County injury attorney specializing in injury claims arising from medical malpractice and medication errors, subjects on which he has written extensively. To request a copy of one of his articles or to discuss your rights and options after an accident, feel free to call 866-981-5596.


    High prices at the pump, warns an Orange County injury lawyer, are not the only thing California residents should be concerned about at Southland gas stations: in the past few months, defective spray nozzles have caused several injuries throughout the state, including one serious enough to require hospitalization.

    The state fire marshal is warning all California residents to the possible spray hazard of the VST made nozzle and has issued a directive to thousands of service station operators to remove the 30,000 “open hold” latches that are in question. These latches are convenient due to the fact that you can go wash your windows at the same time the latch allows the pump to run without you holding it. This will affect approximately one-third of all California service stations.

    Just last month there were accidents here in Orange County as well, in both Huntington Beach and Santa Ana, according to an Orange County injury lawyer. In fact half of all the incidences have been in Southland. The accidents are under investigation and the latches are being removed as a safety precaution until the results of an inquiry into the defective spray nozzles.

    The California state fire marshal cited that this is “a hazard to the public and welfare”. Besides the obvious safety issues of gasoline that is being spraying onto your face and eyes, there is a real fire danger as well. Most Service station owner, obviously concerned for the customer’s safety and possible liability issue, are removing the latches immediately.

    Daniel Berlant from the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection is setting up mandates for Service station owners to be complied with by Oct 15, 2010 They have the option to:
    • Possibly revert back to employee pumping only
    • Removing the convenience of paying at the pump, going inside to pay
    • Remove all latches from the VST nozzles

    One additional warning is to never put another object like a bottle or can to hold the nozzle in your tank. This could unfortunately cause the same problem.

    Currently the deadline to remove all of the latches is required by October 15th. If you still encounter a gas station that has not removed the latch, an Orange County injury lawyer advises that you utilize these safety precautions to avoid an injury.

    Since most accident are occurring once you have picked up the nozzle and then push your selection for type of fuel, experts are suggesting that you put the nozzle into the tank hole before you select the grade of gasoline. This will prevent most of the spray accidents. However, if the latch is still attached to the nozzle, there is still some danger of getting sprayed when you remove it. To be on the safe side for now, try to use only nozzle pumps with no latches attached.

    After Oct. 15th, gas stations that have not complied with this order will be shut down.

    James Ballidis is an Orange County injury lawyer specializing in injury claims arising from accidents resulting from defective products and manufacturer negligence. He has written numerous articles on subjects relevant to personal injury law. To request a copy of one of his books or articles, or to discuss a specific case, feel free to call 866-981-5596.


    A family of three was killed recently when a runaway truck smashed into their home in central California. The truck driver was driving along state highway 154 in Santa Barbara and while merging his truck onto State Street, his brakes suddenly failed. He then proceeded to hit several parked cars and go over an embankment and finally hit the occupied home that had a young family living there, explains a California injury lawyer.

    As the California Highway Patrol crash investigation team tries to reconstruct this accident, they did comment that alcohol was not a factor but that brake failure is suspected. The driver admitted that that the brakes were not working correctly when he picked up his load in Santa Ynez. The driver attempted to use all brake resources available; both hand and foot brakes but nothing could stop this truck.

    Although many truck accident fatalities are caused by driver fatigue, a recent Department of Transportation (DOT) report found that 29.4% of large truck crashes occur due to brake failure. Another common truck accident cause is tire blowout due to worn tires or trucks not loaded properly.

    When brakes malfunction and the driver’s behavior causes serious personal injury or in this case, wrongful death, who do you blame? Should the driver have fixed the issue instead of proceeding with his schedule? Was there a mechanical problem? Had maintenance been overlooked due to budget cut-backs and busy schedules? Was the mandatory brake pre-brake inspection performed?

    Hiring the right California injury lawyer for counsel is advisable when you are struggling with specific truck industry issues and laws.

    The trucking industry is a powerful organization; generating revenues of $610 billion per year, a figure that is set to double by 2015. Commercial trucking is here to stay but that means more cars must share the nation’s roads with even more trucks. Currently, one in eight traffic fatalities involve a trucking collision.

    California is second only to Texas—which has the highest rate—in the number of truck fatalities that occur in the state each year. Investigations reveal that the primary causes of most truck accidents are fatigue and lack of sleep. In fact another runaway truck crash occurred in Northern California earlier this month and killed an innocent man. The CHP is still investigating with The Department of Transportation, DOT. Currently, they are investigating around 20 similar cases.

    Clearly this is a situation that is not going away and needs to be resolved before more innocent people are tragically killed. Our thoughts and prayers are with the surviving relatives of these truck fatalities.

    James Ballidis is a California injury lawyer specializing in truck accidents. He has written numerous articles on trucking accidents. To request a copy of one of his articles or to discuss a specific case, feel free to call 866-981-5596.


Bookmark and Share


Free Book

Contact

Name:

Phone:

Email:

Tell us more:



4400 MacArthur Blvd.
Suite 370
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Phone: 949-752-7474
Fax: 949-752-1645

Get Directions

Video Library

FAQs

Web Resources