The attorneys at Allen, Flatt, Ballidis and Leslie add blog posts regularly to our website.  We cover topics that are important to Southern California accident victims.  Visit this page frequently to read our newest blog posts about bicycle accidents, truck accidents, car accidents, dog bites and other events that injure people throughout Orange County, Los Angeles County, San Diego County, San Bernardino County, Riverside County, Kern County and Ventura County.

Blog

Motorcycle Accidents

Bicycle Accidents

Dog Bite

Auto and Car Accidents

Truck Accident

Pedestrian Accident

Wrongful Death

General

Southern California Injury Law Blog

View More

News

Library

Motorcycle Accidents

Bicycle Accidents

Dog Bite

Auto and Car Accidents

Truck Accident

Pedestrian Accident

Wrongful Death

Lawsuit process

Injury

General

View More

Orange County Accident Lawyer Blog

Our blog posts are added regularly to our website and cover topics that are important to Southern California accident victims.  Visit this page frequently to read our lawyers newest blog posts about bicycle accidents, truck accidents, car accidents, dog bites and other events that injure people throughout Orange County, Los Angeles County, San Diego County, San Bernardino County, Riverside County, Kern County and Ventura County.
Blog Category:

Motorcycle Accidents

10/5/2009
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

To prevent motorcycle deaths on our California highways, car drivers, not just motorcyclists, need more training.

Motorcycle riding kills a lot or riders each year.  Over 100,000 have been killed in statistical studies over the last 40 years in California. Why this occurs in such volume is no surprise, there is nothing preventing you from hitting the pavement.  Even with advances in technology, there is little you can do to prevent serious injury or death, if another driver turns in front of you at the last minute.  Naturally, as riders we think we are invincible, but we are not.

Keeping us safe when we ride is a complex task.  When more than 75% of the accidents that kill involve vehicles, we are not the only ones that need to be educated and trained.  We can wear our helmet, and ride defensively, but more needs to be done to train drivers to be more cautious, anticipate our presence and respect our right of way. 

Here are several suggestions:
1.   Cycle lanes designed for motorcycle use only.
2.   Technological advances that alert drivers that a motorcycle is near.
3.   High beam intensity lights that can be seen more readily by a vehicle driver in daylight as a cycle approaches.
4.   Radar enhanced features that provide an early warning system.

If we train vehicle drivers better, the reduction in motorcycle accidents and injury will mean safer roadways and the ability to continue enjoying a sport we love.

James Ballidis is an attorney with Allen, Flatt, Ballidis & Leslie in Orange County, California.  The firm handles motorcycle accident cases throughout the State and frequently talks on radio and in newsprint about motorcycle accidents and injuries. Call us if you have been involved in a motorcycle accident.  Let us help you with your injury recovery.  Call 1 866 981-5596.

Bicycle Accidents

11/13/2009
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

A California jury decides in rapid fire that defendant guilty of manslaughter for texting while driving.

The family of Danny Oates cried silently as the verdict was read for the defendant, Jeffrey Woods. Woods had pleaded not guilty to texting while driving and ultimately striking Oats as he rode his bicycle in 2007. It took the jury just two hours to review the facts and find Woods guilty of manslaughter. He was texting and under the influence of prescriptions medicines—a combination that would end tragically for a young boy on his bike.
Woods could face a maximum sentence up to 10 years in state prison. The strong sentence will not bring back a 14 year- old Huntington Beach boy, but it will send a strong message to drivers who continue to text while driving here in California.
As new technologies help us to multi-task more efficiently in our everyday lives, the cell phone is by far the most popular. According to Cellular Communications, there are now over 276 million U.S. subscribers to cell phone. In addition, these people are not only talking on their phones but texting over 110 billion times in 2008.
Currently 18 states and the District of Columbia have laws banning texting while driving and the restrictions, although not perfect, have made a difference in accident rates in those states. Accidents rates due to texting while driving are down significantly both in Orange County and throughout California.
The first offense will cost you $76 and additional offenses are around $190, although the fees can vary between different counties. Even if you are stopped at a traffic light, you are still prohibited from using your handheld device. Any law enforcement personnel can give you a citation while you are operating your vehicle, driving or not.
As of July 1st, 2008, it has been illegal for any motorist to use any handheld wireless device while driving a car in California. Additionally, anyone under the age of 18 is prohibited from using either a handheld or hands free type device. The newest Wireless Communication Device Law that became effective January 1, 2009 states that no one can write, send or read any text-based communication on a handheld device while driving a motor vehicle.
Current studies now show that texting while driving increases your potential for a auto accident by a  factor of four. In fact, another study has compared texting and driving to be equal in distraction to a person driving while alcohol impaired with 0.08 BAC. That is legally drunk in the state of California. Driver distraction causes over one million crashes in North America annually. The economic impact reaches nearly $40 billion a year.
According to the American Automobile Association, AAA, there has been a 70% decline in texting while driving since the ban took effect. This data is significant because it shows that some laws can change driver’s behavior. In this case, it will reduce distracted driving and improve driver safety.

Auto and Car Accidents

2/23/2010
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

CA proposition 17 is not a good idea.

Read why California's proposition 17 will cost you more money for car insurance and is sponsored by a notoriously difficult carrier.

10/14/2009
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Cal. State Northridge is dangerous for pedestrians!

On a Sunday last November, an exchange student Yao Lu was struck by a car even though she made eye contact with the driver before stepping off the curb. 

The accident occurred on the northeast corner of Reseda Boulevard and Vincennes Street.  Despite making eye contact, the driver of a gray or silver four-door sedan, struck her.  He was on a cell phone.  He sped away and there is a reward for his identity. 

Lu spent eight days in a coma. The unidentified driver left the scene of the crime, and despite a police sketch of his face and a $50,000 reward, he has not been found.

There have been many other accidents in the area according to a research a project by student journalists for CSUN. They concluded that even though there has been a statewide finding of a decrease in pedestrian fatalities, there is a rise in fatal pedestrian accidents in the CSUN area, according to the student journalists.

This article illustrates the danger of being on a cell phone while driving. It is incomprehensible that a pedestrian could make eye contact with the driver, but the drivers so engrossed in their telephone conversation they did not notice the pedestrian. However, even I tend to stare off at unknown objects on the wall or on the ceiling when I'm on the phone in my office. It is not difficult to appreciate the lack of concentration on driving when you are preoccupied with an important cell phone call.

California took the right step when enacting the California statute against cell phone use without a hands-free device. This case is an example of why that statute is so important, and must be enforced.

If you have been involved in an auto accident by a driver using cell phone, contact our office. We are actively pursuing punitive damages against such drivers for their willful, intentional endangerment of those on the road.  Call us at 1 866-981-5596.

10/5/2009
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Will tort reform cure your aching insurance wallet!

No!  No!  No!  So why not - you say?  Let me tell you from a California injury attorney perspective why tort reform does nothing but take from you when you have a claim and increase not decrease wasteful litigation and claim delay.

First, we already have tort reform, and it does not work.  Let’s take a look at both of them. 

The California workers compensation system is simply broken.  It is a system designed as no fault, with administrative regulation of the healing and care of workers. Claimant lawyers play a very small and insignificant part of the compensation equation.  They only recover a fee of 10% to 15% if the worker has permanent injury.  You should therefore be of the opinion that the government, insurance companies and doctors could work together to get people the treatment they need and get them back to work quickly.  Again not so. 

A personal friend has waited 4 years for authorization to get much needed shoulder surgery.  Think that is unusual, wrong again.  Most attorneys in workers compensation, for both sides, say that the delay in treatment for serious procedures is at least 1 year and sometimes two.  Litigation has actually increased over the need for treatment.

Why is this happening?  Simple, there is no penalty if the insurance carrier and doctors rip off the injured.  Tort reform takes away penalties for wrongful and delaying tactics.  Administrators cannot act fast enough or quick enough to stop the rampant delays and fraud.    The system was supposed to pay for medical treatment needed by injured workers without lawyer involvement, but more litigation is occurring now to simply get the treatment needed.  If severe penalties were affixed for delaying tactics or improper bad faith conduct on the part of insurance companies, and doctors, punitive damages for instance, I assure you that the system would work better and in the long run work out to be fair and efficient.

Let’s talk medical malpractice.  Our office does not do worker’s compensation or medical malpractice so you are not getting a biased opinion here.  MICRA was enacted to eliminate punitive damage claims, cap pain and suffering at $250,000, limit attorney fees  and give doctors all the defenses of a short statute of limitations and low standard of care to be judged competent.  Ask any doctor and they will still complain that they practice defensive medicine.  Additionally, insurance companies go to trial more than any other segment because they know their loss is capped.  There is no incentive to settle so they risk a trial to see if they can avoid paying a judgment.  Over the years, premiums have gone higher in this segment than any other segment of insurance coverage.

If you allowed a jury to decide the pain and suffering damages for removing the wrong arm at surgery,  I assure you no cases would be occurring so haphazardly.  If the doctor faces personal bankruptcy for gross negligence, not just a mistake, then that doctor will act very cautiously WHICH IS WHAT THEY SHOULD BE DOING.  Medical malpractice claims have been increasing, not decreasing compared to 20 years ago, even though fees for attorneys were severely limited.  MICRA simply does not work.

The best system of deterrence is to make sure people know a consequence when they drive drunk, cheat another, commit gross negligence or knowingly make defective products.  The American system of justice is based on this economic premise, because in the years of greed and excess, very few stop to consider the consequences until severe injury occurs. 

One teen in Orange County pleaded last week for leniency for drunk driving that killed his friend.  He declared he was profoundly sorry, and did not realize what injury would likely occur.  Adult drivers know what will occur, but unless they are faced with an economic consequence of bad behavior they will continue to drive drunk, text, and drive recklessly.  It is no different with doctors or insurance companies.

James Ballidis is an attorney practicing in Newport Beach, California and specializes in personal injury claims throughout California.  Call us at 1 866 981-5596.

General

2/26/2010
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Personal injury case: the number one question always asked

The first and almost universal question clients ask about a personal injury case is how long is it going to take. Here is an answer and explanation.

Southern California Injury Law Blog

    Last week an Orange County jury awarded $3.1 million to a woman who suffered a medication overdose at a skilled nursing home that left her brain damaged. Barbara Lefforge, only 57 years old was sent to St. Edna’s center for rehabilitation after a tendon repair surgery. She had only been there 5 ½ hours when the medication error occurred, explained an Orange County injury attorney.

    According to court records, after her surgery her doctor recommended that she stay at St. Edna’s skilled nursing facility until she recuperated. She was mistakenly given 50mg of morphine instead of 50mg of Demerol. Since this was such an excessive dose, Lefforge’s attorney argued that medical personnel should have questioned that dosage order. Moreover the staff pharmacist even warned that the dosage was too high, but Lefforge’s doctor had doubled it, so she was given that quantity of medication.

    Lefforge was left unmonitored until the next morning when she was found barely breathing due to the medication error. She had suffered from a major overdose of morphine. After being taken to the hospital, it was established that she had suffered a brain injury from the excessive morphine dose.

    St. Edna Rehabilitation Center is one of 25 California rehab facilities owned by Covenant Care. Since 2004, they have accepted more than $880 million in additional compensation from the state for increased wages and staffing. According to the non-profit group, “California Watch”, it found that many Covenant Care facilities actually reduced their staff and let nursing ratios go below state standards during this time.

    Tragically this is not an isolated case. Nearly one in five dosing orders of all nursing homes and hospitals has medication errors. These odds are unacceptable. In many cases, these patients are there for short stays while rehabilitating, not lifelong residents. It is for this reason that every citizen should have an up-to-date medical directive.

    Only about 20% of Americans have a medical directive document; however, explained an Orange County injury attorney, it is one of the most important documents a person can have. The Advanced Health Care Directive is the best way to make known your health care wishes if you are incapacitated and can’t communicate your wishes.

    Unfortunately, just telling your wishes to your husband or wife does not automatically ensure that they will be honored. Here in California, the law gives you two options for your directive: you can either appoint another person who can make the decisions for you or you can make your desires known through writing your own advanced directive. Either way, it’s important to meet with a professional lawyer to discuss your legal options.

    If you have a loved one in any type of nursing facility, it would be wise to double-check that their medical directive matches the instructions that the staff has. If you have any questions or concerns regarding a nursing home in California, visit www.nursinghomeguide.org/ for a complete listing by city or county of local elder facilities and their violations, staffing policies, and complaints.

    James Ballidis is an Orange County injury attorney specializing in injury claims arising from medical malpractice and medication errors, subjects on which he has written extensively. To request a copy of one of his articles or to discuss your rights and options after an accident, feel free to call 866-981-5596.


    High prices at the pump, warns an Orange County injury lawyer, are not the only thing California residents should be concerned about at Southland gas stations: in the past few months, defective spray nozzles have caused several injuries throughout the state, including one serious enough to require hospitalization.

    The state fire marshal is warning all California residents to the possible spray hazard of the VST made nozzle and has issued a directive to thousands of service station operators to remove the 30,000 “open hold” latches that are in question. These latches are convenient due to the fact that you can go wash your windows at the same time the latch allows the pump to run without you holding it. This will affect approximately one-third of all California service stations.

    Just last month there were accidents here in Orange County as well, in both Huntington Beach and Santa Ana, according to an Orange County injury lawyer. In fact half of all the incidences have been in Southland. The accidents are under investigation and the latches are being removed as a safety precaution until the results of an inquiry into the defective spray nozzles.

    The California state fire marshal cited that this is “a hazard to the public and welfare”. Besides the obvious safety issues of gasoline that is being spraying onto your face and eyes, there is a real fire danger as well. Most Service station owner, obviously concerned for the customer’s safety and possible liability issue, are removing the latches immediately.

    Daniel Berlant from the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection is setting up mandates for Service station owners to be complied with by Oct 15, 2010 They have the option to:
    • Possibly revert back to employee pumping only
    • Removing the convenience of paying at the pump, going inside to pay
    • Remove all latches from the VST nozzles

    One additional warning is to never put another object like a bottle or can to hold the nozzle in your tank. This could unfortunately cause the same problem.

    Currently the deadline to remove all of the latches is required by October 15th. If you still encounter a gas station that has not removed the latch, an Orange County injury lawyer advises that you utilize these safety precautions to avoid an injury.

    Since most accident are occurring once you have picked up the nozzle and then push your selection for type of fuel, experts are suggesting that you put the nozzle into the tank hole before you select the grade of gasoline. This will prevent most of the spray accidents. However, if the latch is still attached to the nozzle, there is still some danger of getting sprayed when you remove it. To be on the safe side for now, try to use only nozzle pumps with no latches attached.

    After Oct. 15th, gas stations that have not complied with this order will be shut down.

    James Ballidis is an Orange County injury lawyer specializing in injury claims arising from accidents resulting from defective products and manufacturer negligence. He has written numerous articles on subjects relevant to personal injury law. To request a copy of one of his books or articles, or to discuss a specific case, feel free to call 866-981-5596.


    A family of three was killed recently when a runaway truck smashed into their home in central California. The truck driver was driving along state highway 154 in Santa Barbara and while merging his truck onto State Street, his brakes suddenly failed. He then proceeded to hit several parked cars and go over an embankment and finally hit the occupied home that had a young family living there, explains a California injury lawyer.

    As the California Highway Patrol crash investigation team tries to reconstruct this accident, they did comment that alcohol was not a factor but that brake failure is suspected. The driver admitted that that the brakes were not working correctly when he picked up his load in Santa Ynez. The driver attempted to use all brake resources available; both hand and foot brakes but nothing could stop this truck.

    Although many truck accident fatalities are caused by driver fatigue, a recent Department of Transportation (DOT) report found that 29.4% of large truck crashes occur due to brake failure. Another common truck accident cause is tire blowout due to worn tires or trucks not loaded properly.

    When brakes malfunction and the driver’s behavior causes serious personal injury or in this case, wrongful death, who do you blame? Should the driver have fixed the issue instead of proceeding with his schedule? Was there a mechanical problem? Had maintenance been overlooked due to budget cut-backs and busy schedules? Was the mandatory brake pre-brake inspection performed?

    Hiring the right California injury lawyer for counsel is advisable when you are struggling with specific truck industry issues and laws.

    The trucking industry is a powerful organization; generating revenues of $610 billion per year, a figure that is set to double by 2015. Commercial trucking is here to stay but that means more cars must share the nation’s roads with even more trucks. Currently, one in eight traffic fatalities involve a trucking collision.

    California is second only to Texas—which has the highest rate—in the number of truck fatalities that occur in the state each year. Investigations reveal that the primary causes of most truck accidents are fatigue and lack of sleep. In fact another runaway truck crash occurred in Northern California earlier this month and killed an innocent man. The CHP is still investigating with The Department of Transportation, DOT. Currently, they are investigating around 20 similar cases.

    Clearly this is a situation that is not going away and needs to be resolved before more innocent people are tragically killed. Our thoughts and prayers are with the surviving relatives of these truck fatalities.

    James Ballidis is a California injury lawyer specializing in truck accidents. He has written numerous articles on trucking accidents. To request a copy of one of his articles or to discuss a specific case, feel free to call 866-981-5596.


Bookmark and Share


Free Book

Contact

Name:

Phone:

Email:

Tell us more:



4400 MacArthur Blvd.
Suite 370
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Phone: 949-752-7474
Fax: 949-752-1645

Get Directions

Video Library

FAQs

Web Resources