The attorneys at Allen, Flatt, Ballidis and Leslie add blog posts regularly to our website.  We cover topics that are important to Southern California accident victims.  Visit this page frequently to read our newest blog posts about bicycle accidents, truck accidents, car accidents, dog bites and other events that injure people throughout Orange County, Los Angeles County, San Diego County, San Bernardino County, Riverside County, Kern County and Ventura County.

Blog

Motorcycle Accidents

Bicycle Accidents

Dog Bite

Auto and Car Accidents

Truck Accident

Pedestrian Accident

Wrongful Death

General

Southern California Injury Law Blog

View More

News

Library

Motorcycle Accidents

Bicycle Accidents

Dog Bite

Auto and Car Accidents

Truck Accident

Pedestrian Accident

Wrongful Death

Lawsuit process

Injury

General

View More

Orange County Accident Lawyer Blog

Our blog posts are added regularly to our website and cover topics that are important to Southern California accident victims.  Visit this page frequently to read our lawyers newest blog posts about bicycle accidents, truck accidents, car accidents, dog bites and other events that injure people throughout Orange County, Los Angeles County, San Diego County, San Bernardino County, Riverside County, Kern County and Ventura County.
Blog Category:

Auto and Car Accidents

2/26/2010
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Auto accidents caused by speeding are largely avoidable

Speeding causes daily accidents and injury. What can we do and what rights does a person struck by a speeder have? California auto accident lawyer James Ballidis provides an outline of the problem and your rights. Call 1 866 981-5596 if you need help because of an accident.

12/8/2009
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Fog kills 5.5% of those involved in an accident!

Careful as fog season rolls in. 5.5% of those involved in a fog related accident die of their injuries.

12/4/2009
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Seat belts were not used and did not save this 10 year old!

Seat belt use saves lives from wrongful death and great tragedy in auto accidents. This family did not listen and lost their 10 year old.

10/16/2009
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Tort reform requires companies to act responsibly, but as long as a company is motivated by profit, they will not. Here is another example.


A Los Angeles jury awarded four million dollars to a cinematographer injured on the job during the filming of Flight of the Phoenix.  He had at all times prior to his accident been an independent contractor of Fox and Flight Productions Inc.  The distinction is an important one: an independent contractor pays his own taxes, social security, retirement benefits, health insurance and self-employment tax.  Corporations that employ independent contractors save huge amounts of money.

The plaintiff, Ciaran Barry, was struck by a prop, which caused him significant injury including broken legs and permanent nerve damage.  He would never work as a cinematographer again. 

Once the accident occurred, Fox and Flight Productions Inc. demanded that Mr. Barry be considered an employee under workers’ compensation laws.  Workers’ compensation laws significantly limit the amount of recovery available to an injured worker.  It is no-fault compromise system that is designed to cover workers for injury if they are injured on the job.  Because it is a compromise system, without fault, the recovery amounts are strongly reduced.  As an example a wrongful death case only pays $350,000 no matter how much money and how needed the worker was to the family.  

In this case, a workers’ compensation case would have substantially less value.  The court, and jury, properly concluded that Barry was an independent contractor given the factual evidence at trial of his independent status prior to the injury.  However, this case shows us the often-overlooked side of corporations, the desire to put their interests over the injured person.  To put this loss onto worker’s compensation, the company can continue to pay less for insurance, and save all the fees and liability caused by their negligent and dangerous practices.  

Corporations will always attempt to mitigate their damages at the expense of injured victims, which is the reason that tort reform and limitations on liability simply do not work.

10/9/2009
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Tort reform does not work because companies simply cannot be trusted to act responsibly!

Tort reform does not work.  Read this analysis and see if you  agree.

The national debate continues: do we limit the right to bring a lawsuit when companies and insurers do the wrong thing?  I recently wrote of several “tort reform” failures that exist in our midst.  Here is a fresh look at one of the most powerful tort reform failures we currently endure.

In a well-presented article in the Los Angeles Times by Lisa Girion, mother Hilda Sarkisyan had to bury her daughter Nataline because CIGNA refused to authorize a kidney transplant.  At 17, Nataline died when Cigna, without even discussing or investigating the recommendations of Nataline’s UCLA doctors, denied coverage as experimental. “Experimental” in the experience of this California personal injury attorney is usually just another word for “we don’t want to pay for it.”  
 
In a lawsuit filed by the family for wrongful death, a judge properly ruled that the CIGNA process of denial cannot be reviewed or challenged after the death of Nataline.  ERISA, the Employee is Retirement Income Security Act, prohibits lawsuits for economic damages, even if the denial of service was purposefully negligent or wrongful, egregious or arbitrary.  The only lawsuit that can be brought is for a review of the denial and reinstitution of medical treatment, if the patient is still alive.  Of course, most of the time, it is too late for the patient.  Nataline died nine days after the request.  There is no provision for lawyer fees, and judicial review takes a long time, so cases are rarely brought.

My experience as a personal injury lawyer of 25 years, dealing with many seriously injured client insurers, is that in serious injury and medically complicated cases, almost all insurance companies routinely deny first requests for expensive procedures, without any consultation or discussion with the treating doctors.   Time and again we see a denial without even an explanation, other than “experimental,” “inadequately documented,” or “not medically necessary.”  Remember, the treating doctor is the best and most suited to make medical decisions, and his or her opinion should be paramount.  Instead, the insurer employs some hatchet man to review these requests, and keep the purse strings closed.  Almost always, our office is dealing with a decision maker that has no training in medicine or on a few occasions an employed nurse. 

ERISA is tort reform!  In order to give incentives to insurance companies to offer insurance nationally, the industry demanded concessions, and one concession was to limit lawsuits for improper denial of benefits.  In exchange, insurance companies “promised” to set up review procedures, and to treat patients fairly.  They agreed to administrative procedures built into the law to avoid litigation and the all-terrible lawyer.

These are the same promises we receive from all those who claim tort reform is the answer to the expense of insurance today.  Relying on companies to do the right thing simply doesn't work. Even insiders agree that without consequences, insurers are not going to act responsibly.  Wendell Potter, a CIGNA spokesperson, left CIGNA’s employ after addressing the publicity surrounding this case.  He is quoted by Ms. Girion: “HMO’s and insurers are largely free to deny access to care without fear of reprisal and financial consequences.”

Tort reform promises a fair administrative process to protect the public from big business. Unfortunately, the public needs lawyers and the weapon of financial consequences to make sure insurance companies act in the best interests of those they serve.

California first party auto insurance (dealing with your insurance company in an auto accident) is an example of a system that has worked properly.  In the early 80’s, first party insurance companies did little to treat their insured fairly when handling cases. Lawsuits were brought, and a number of large verdicts were entered for egregious and unfair conduct.  Eventually, insurance companies cleaned up their act.  As an auto accident attorney, we rarely see misconduct in the investigation and negotiation of first party insurance benefits now, because the companies were held accountable and profit is their motivation.  We still have the tool of California first party insurance bad faith, but claims and filings are almost non-existent compared to the 80’s. 

Nataline’s death is an unacceptable byproduct of tort reform. Until we recognize the immutable truth that businesses will act in their financial interest over that of the public no matter how much we want to believe otherwise, your fate and mine will be inexorably tied to that of Nataline, a roll of the dice, and the luck that it is someone else and not me or my family who is at the Dr. office.

Just say no to tort reform.  Let capitalism thrive by making sure that those who did not act responsibly suffer the financial consequence of a lawsuit against them.

As a final note, why was this article in the Times so interesting?  Even though CIGNA killed this woman’s child, they insulted her when she complained at their home office by heckling and finger flipping.  Correctly, this is not a matter for ERISA.  We expect everyone in society to act responsibly, and this type of conduct allows her to bring a lawsuit.  Isn’t it strange that we protect Nataline’s mom from humiliation and emotional distress, but do not allow Nataline her life?  We can live without tort reform.

Truck Accident

2/4/2010
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Over 10,000 die in rollover accidents. The real dangers of SUV, Minivans and trucks.

The rollover accident is by far the deadliest risk facing SUV, minivan and truck drivers. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) more than 280,000 rollover accidents are reported each year and sadly, over 10,000 fatalities. These types of accidents are usually twofold; first the rollover occurs and then the roof crushes in and seriously injuries the occupants causing major head trauma. Rollover crashes result in 36% more passenger injuries than non-rollover accidents and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) has researched that if SUV’s were just one inch lower, deaths would by decreases by one half.

A SUV is 3 times as likely to rollover in an accident as a typical sedan. There are two main reasons for this; vehicle’s stability and high center of gravity. Rollover accidents are directly related to a vehicles’ center of gravity and the track width (The distance between the left and right wheel). A narrow track and high center of gravity can make a vehicle unstable while performing fast or sharp turns. In addition to the center of gravity, vehicle stability is also influenced by weight/passenger loads in the vehicle.

Beyond the physical characteristics of SUV, vans and trucks, additional causes of rollovers are tire blowouts, malfunctioning auto parts and of course, driver error. Maintaining correct tire pressure and performing normal vehicle maintenance will prevent some incidences. However, quick jerky motions are dangerous in high profile vehicles as well as high speeds.

The IIHS has recently released its “Top Safety Picks” for 2010 and the list was unusually short due to tougher standards for roof strength this model year. Twenty seven vehicles; 19 cars and 8 SUV’s made the coveted list. To earn a five star rating, the vehicle must be able to withstand four times its weight without crumpling more than 5 inches.

Subaru, Ford, Volkswagen, and Audi were winners in multiple categories. If you are considering purchasing a new vehicle, check the IIHS’s website, www.iihs.org/ for a full list of winners.
The Foundation for Traffic Safety has compiled some safety tips to reduce your involvement in a rollover accident.

·    Don’t drive too fast--The faster you drive, the less time you will have to react to an emergency that suddenly appears on the road in front of you. Braking harder and steering more sharply can compromise the safe control of your vehicle.
·    Steering-- Many rollovers occur when drivers overcorrect their steering in response to an unexpected situation, such as encountering a stopped vehicle or accidently driving off the pavement. Sudden steering maneuvers at high speeds or on soft surfaces can lead to rollovers.
·    Know proper maneuvering—if your vehicle leaves the paved road surface, slow down gradually, don’t stomp on your brakes. When it is safe to turn again, slowly merge back on the roadway. Never jerk your steering wheel to get back on the road.
·    Be extra careful on rural roads—75% of rollover accidents happen on rural roads.
·    Tires—improperly inflated or worn tires can make a dangerous situation worse; monitor correct pressure and replace tires when worn.
·    Vehicle loading—consult your owner’s manual for proper safe loading techniques of your vehicle. Realize that any load placed on the roof will raise your vehicles’ center of gravity, increasing the risk of a rollover.
Lastly, when purchasing a new vehicle, research rollover ratings at www.safercar.gov/


Pedestrian Accident

3/5/2010
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Student killed in hit and run on Sunset Boulevard in Westwood

Hit and run of child in affluent neighborhood of Brentwood underscores the need for stiffer penalties when found.

1/21/2010
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Costa Mesa Pedestrians are at risk of serious injury or death

This article notes a rising trend of serious injury or death for pedestrians in Costa Mesa, California. Who are the victims of this trend and what is being done about it.

10/15/2009
Connie Gray
Comments (0)

Frightening facts: Halloween is a deadly night for pedestrians

Halloween is about ghosts and goblins, treats and dressing up.  It’s about being scared, but scared in a fun way. Unfortunately, Halloween can sometimes be a nightmare.  According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s (NHTSA)  Fatality Analysis Reporting Dataset, children are four times more likely to be killed in a pedestrian car accident between 4pm and 8pm on Halloween night than on any other day of the year.  
 
A hazardous combination of low visibility, children out after dark and adult drivers attending Halloween parties can too often prove fatal.  Nearly fifty-three percent of traffic fatalities on Halloween involve alcohol.  And, forty-five percent of all Halloween deaths involve a drunk driver.  This makes Halloween one of the deadliest nights of the year.
 
There are simple precautions that can help make Halloween safer.  Dress children in light-colored, reflective clothing and give them flashlights or glow sticks.  In the Los Angeles area, drivers are often in a hurry and impatient with pedestrians, so accompany your children while trick-or-treating.  Stay on the sidewalk, and only cross at well-lit cross-walks or intersections.  Click here for more Halloween Safety Tips.
 
If you are a driver, slow down and watch for children.  Pedestrians always have the right-of-way.
 
The pedestrian accident attorneys at Allen, Flatt, Ballidis and Leslie wish you a happy and safe Halloween.


Wrongful Death

2/23/2010
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Blue Cross quickly becoming the Toyota of bad business.

Blue Cross quickly becoming the Toyota of bad business. Personal Injury attorney James Ballidis discusses the continuing criminality of both.

2/4/2010
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Doctor gets away with murder by paying $250,000.

MICRA damages limit this doctor to a payment of $250,000 for manslaughter or murder of a 20 year old woman.

2/4/2010
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Doctor gets away with murder by paying $250,000.

MICRA damages limit this doctor to a payment of $250,000 for manslaughter or murder of a 20 year old woman.

General

10/28/2009
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Robes are catching fire and causing severe injuries, recall is now in effect.


Nine women died when cooking with their robes on when it suddenly caught fire.  The fire spread so quickly that the victims never had a chance to remove the garments.  Finally Blair LLC has voluntarily recalled their full-length chenille robes and other chenille products due to their flammability problems. 

All nine deaths occurred before the April 2009 recall but since then other injuries have taken place. Burn injuries are among some of the most painful injuries to endure. In addition to the deaths there have been many moderate to severe burn injuries.

Effective immediately, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is advising women to discontinue wearing these dangerously flammable garments.  Blair products are mainly sold online and in catalogs, but they have a few stores as well. The recalled items include the chenille jacket, robe, lounge jacket and several tops. If you have purchased any of these products, return them to Blair to receive a $50 gift card for store credit. For further information you can visit the CPSC’s website at www.cpsc.gov.

We hope and pray for the families, and all victims should seek the assistance of a pwersonal injury or wrongful death attorney immediately. They have product liability claims.  If you know someone who nmeeds to find a quaalified attorney for these types of cases, we wrote an article on how to find a qualified wrongful death attorney.

10/15/2009
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

A claim that paramedics did not properly care for heart attack victim is denied as California statute requires a claim be filed within 6 months.


An Orange County woman, Christine Palmer has filed a claim against the city of Huntington Beach for negligence of the paramedics during an emergency.

The incident happened last year when Mrs. Palmer called 9-1-1 when her husband was experiencing extreme chest pain, labored breathing and numbness in his arm. Even though these were typical heart attack symptoms, the paramedics did not suspect a heart attack.  Her husband was transported to the local hospital in an ambulance and without a paramedic.  Should they have suspected heart failure or other similar maladies?
During the drive Mr. Palmer went into a grand mal seizure and had no pulse when he arrived at the hospital.  The hospital ER team tried to revive him but could not.

Huntington Beach officials are currently investigating this case but Mrs. Palmer‘s attorney filed the claim two months past the 6 month city deadline. It is unclear whether the claim will proceed forward, because you must file a claim against a public entity, even if medical negligence cases, within 6 months, except in certain circumstances.
If you have been injured in an accident and  feel some governmental agency is at fault, please contact a qualified and experienced California personal injury attorney immediately.  You may be precluded from pursuing your claim if you wait.

Call us, we would be happy to speak to you for free.  Call 1 866 981-5596 or contact us via email.  We can help.


Southern California Injury Law Blog

    Last week an Orange County jury awarded $3.1 million to a woman who suffered a medication overdose at a skilled nursing home that left her brain damaged. Barbara Lefforge, only 57 years old was sent to St. Edna’s center for rehabilitation after a tendon repair surgery. She had only been there 5 ½ hours when the medication error occurred, explained an Orange County injury attorney.

    According to court records, after her surgery her doctor recommended that she stay at St. Edna’s skilled nursing facility until she recuperated. She was mistakenly given 50mg of morphine instead of 50mg of Demerol. Since this was such an excessive dose, Lefforge’s attorney argued that medical personnel should have questioned that dosage order. Moreover the staff pharmacist even warned that the dosage was too high, but Lefforge’s doctor had doubled it, so she was given that quantity of medication.

    Lefforge was left unmonitored until the next morning when she was found barely breathing due to the medication error. She had suffered from a major overdose of morphine. After being taken to the hospital, it was established that she had suffered a brain injury from the excessive morphine dose.

    St. Edna Rehabilitation Center is one of 25 California rehab facilities owned by Covenant Care. Since 2004, they have accepted more than $880 million in additional compensation from the state for increased wages and staffing. According to the non-profit group, “California Watch”, it found that many Covenant Care facilities actually reduced their staff and let nursing ratios go below state standards during this time.

    Tragically this is not an isolated case. Nearly one in five dosing orders of all nursing homes and hospitals has medication errors. These odds are unacceptable. In many cases, these patients are there for short stays while rehabilitating, not lifelong residents. It is for this reason that every citizen should have an up-to-date medical directive.

    Only about 20% of Americans have a medical directive document; however, explained an Orange County injury attorney, it is one of the most important documents a person can have. The Advanced Health Care Directive is the best way to make known your health care wishes if you are incapacitated and can’t communicate your wishes.

    Unfortunately, just telling your wishes to your husband or wife does not automatically ensure that they will be honored. Here in California, the law gives you two options for your directive: you can either appoint another person who can make the decisions for you or you can make your desires known through writing your own advanced directive. Either way, it’s important to meet with a professional lawyer to discuss your legal options.

    If you have a loved one in any type of nursing facility, it would be wise to double-check that their medical directive matches the instructions that the staff has. If you have any questions or concerns regarding a nursing home in California, visit www.nursinghomeguide.org/ for a complete listing by city or county of local elder facilities and their violations, staffing policies, and complaints.

    James Ballidis is an Orange County injury attorney specializing in injury claims arising from medical malpractice and medication errors, subjects on which he has written extensively. To request a copy of one of his articles or to discuss your rights and options after an accident, feel free to call 866-981-5596.


    High prices at the pump, warns an Orange County injury lawyer, are not the only thing California residents should be concerned about at Southland gas stations: in the past few months, defective spray nozzles have caused several injuries throughout the state, including one serious enough to require hospitalization.

    The state fire marshal is warning all California residents to the possible spray hazard of the VST made nozzle and has issued a directive to thousands of service station operators to remove the 30,000 “open hold” latches that are in question. These latches are convenient due to the fact that you can go wash your windows at the same time the latch allows the pump to run without you holding it. This will affect approximately one-third of all California service stations.

    Just last month there were accidents here in Orange County as well, in both Huntington Beach and Santa Ana, according to an Orange County injury lawyer. In fact half of all the incidences have been in Southland. The accidents are under investigation and the latches are being removed as a safety precaution until the results of an inquiry into the defective spray nozzles.

    The California state fire marshal cited that this is “a hazard to the public and welfare”. Besides the obvious safety issues of gasoline that is being spraying onto your face and eyes, there is a real fire danger as well. Most Service station owner, obviously concerned for the customer’s safety and possible liability issue, are removing the latches immediately.

    Daniel Berlant from the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection is setting up mandates for Service station owners to be complied with by Oct 15, 2010 They have the option to:
    • Possibly revert back to employee pumping only
    • Removing the convenience of paying at the pump, going inside to pay
    • Remove all latches from the VST nozzles

    One additional warning is to never put another object like a bottle or can to hold the nozzle in your tank. This could unfortunately cause the same problem.

    Currently the deadline to remove all of the latches is required by October 15th. If you still encounter a gas station that has not removed the latch, an Orange County injury lawyer advises that you utilize these safety precautions to avoid an injury.

    Since most accident are occurring once you have picked up the nozzle and then push your selection for type of fuel, experts are suggesting that you put the nozzle into the tank hole before you select the grade of gasoline. This will prevent most of the spray accidents. However, if the latch is still attached to the nozzle, there is still some danger of getting sprayed when you remove it. To be on the safe side for now, try to use only nozzle pumps with no latches attached.

    After Oct. 15th, gas stations that have not complied with this order will be shut down.

    James Ballidis is an Orange County injury lawyer specializing in injury claims arising from accidents resulting from defective products and manufacturer negligence. He has written numerous articles on subjects relevant to personal injury law. To request a copy of one of his books or articles, or to discuss a specific case, feel free to call 866-981-5596.


    A family of three was killed recently when a runaway truck smashed into their home in central California. The truck driver was driving along state highway 154 in Santa Barbara and while merging his truck onto State Street, his brakes suddenly failed. He then proceeded to hit several parked cars and go over an embankment and finally hit the occupied home that had a young family living there, explains a California injury lawyer.

    As the California Highway Patrol crash investigation team tries to reconstruct this accident, they did comment that alcohol was not a factor but that brake failure is suspected. The driver admitted that that the brakes were not working correctly when he picked up his load in Santa Ynez. The driver attempted to use all brake resources available; both hand and foot brakes but nothing could stop this truck.

    Although many truck accident fatalities are caused by driver fatigue, a recent Department of Transportation (DOT) report found that 29.4% of large truck crashes occur due to brake failure. Another common truck accident cause is tire blowout due to worn tires or trucks not loaded properly.

    When brakes malfunction and the driver’s behavior causes serious personal injury or in this case, wrongful death, who do you blame? Should the driver have fixed the issue instead of proceeding with his schedule? Was there a mechanical problem? Had maintenance been overlooked due to budget cut-backs and busy schedules? Was the mandatory brake pre-brake inspection performed?

    Hiring the right California injury lawyer for counsel is advisable when you are struggling with specific truck industry issues and laws.

    The trucking industry is a powerful organization; generating revenues of $610 billion per year, a figure that is set to double by 2015. Commercial trucking is here to stay but that means more cars must share the nation’s roads with even more trucks. Currently, one in eight traffic fatalities involve a trucking collision.

    California is second only to Texas—which has the highest rate—in the number of truck fatalities that occur in the state each year. Investigations reveal that the primary causes of most truck accidents are fatigue and lack of sleep. In fact another runaway truck crash occurred in Northern California earlier this month and killed an innocent man. The CHP is still investigating with The Department of Transportation, DOT. Currently, they are investigating around 20 similar cases.

    Clearly this is a situation that is not going away and needs to be resolved before more innocent people are tragically killed. Our thoughts and prayers are with the surviving relatives of these truck fatalities.

    James Ballidis is a California injury lawyer specializing in truck accidents. He has written numerous articles on trucking accidents. To request a copy of one of his articles or to discuss a specific case, feel free to call 866-981-5596.


Bookmark and Share


Free Book

Contact

Name:

Phone:

Email:

Tell us more:



4400 MacArthur Blvd.
Suite 370
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Phone: 949-752-7474
Fax: 949-752-1645

Get Directions

Video Library

FAQs

Web Resources