The attorneys at Allen, Flatt, Ballidis and Leslie add blog posts regularly to our website.  We cover topics that are important to Southern California accident victims.  Visit this page frequently to read our newest blog posts about bicycle accidents, truck accidents, car accidents, dog bites and other events that injure people throughout Orange County, Los Angeles County, San Diego County, San Bernardino County, Riverside County, Kern County and Ventura County.

Blog

Motorcycle Accidents

Bicycle Accidents

Dog Bite

Auto and Car Accidents

Truck Accident

Pedestrian Accident

Wrongful Death

General

Southern California Injury Law Blog

View More

News

Library

Motorcycle Accidents

Bicycle Accidents

Dog Bite

Auto and Car Accidents

Truck Accident

Pedestrian Accident

Wrongful Death

Lawsuit process

Injury

General

View More

Orange County Accident Lawyer Blog

Our blog posts are added regularly to our website and cover topics that are important to Southern California accident victims.  Visit this page frequently to read our lawyers newest blog posts about bicycle accidents, truck accidents, car accidents, dog bites and other events that injure people throughout Orange County, Los Angeles County, San Diego County, San Bernardino County, Riverside County, Kern County and Ventura County.
Blog Category:

Dog Bite

10/19/2009
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Bull mastiff mauling of woman leads to lawsuit against owner and County Animal Care services

Last December a Laguna Hills woman was viciously attacked by three bullmastiffs and narrowly escaped death due to the heroic efforts of two neighbors. This week she is suing the city of Laguna Hills and the Orange County Animal Care Services for not doing enough to protect her from these known violent dogs.
According to the lawsuit, Dr. Elaine Christian was taking a walk around her mother’s neighborhood when suddenly she was mauled by three bullmastiffs, weighing between 95 to 130 pounds. If it wasn’t for a neighbor, Jim Warren, who witnessed the attack, Christian may not be here today. Warren literally threw himself over the woman to shield her from the dogs. Another neighbor who was attacked earlier as well was able to escape and call 9-1-1.
The Orange County Sheriffs were the first to arrive on the scene and had to Taser and pepper spray to control the dogs. They were later put to sleep.
Since the attack, many neighbors have come forward to tell their stories of the dogs running loose in the neighborhood, dog brawls and other more minor attacks. Orange County Animal Care Services had even quarantined one of the dogs prior to this episode for fighting.
Lawyers for the public agencies argue that they are not liable for and have no legal obligation to prevent such attacks.  The law is under development in this area.  City and County officials are mandated by statute to act in certain circumstances.  If they are mandated to act, the agency can be held liability for failure to carry out that mandate.  If on the other hand, the local and county ordinances are written in vague terms and not mandatory terms, there is no duty to act and thus no liability. 
As an example, in a case we recently settled, the Municipal Code of San Clemente 6.28.010, made provisions for the definition of a “vicious dog” and set forth procedures to follow when the dog was determined to be vicious.  The agency failed thereafter to follow the ordinance, and thus had liability for the incident.  
Whether a claim can be made against a governmental entity is a matter for an experienced California dog bite attorney.  Additionally, most cases require the victim file a written claim against the proper entity within 6 months or you are precluded from suing the entity.
Call us if you have such a claim.  We can help you.  Call now at 1 866 981-5596.

Auto and Car Accidents

2/26/2010
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Auto accidents caused by speeding are largely avoidable

Speeding causes daily accidents and injury. What can we do and what rights does a person struck by a speeder have? California auto accident lawyer James Ballidis provides an outline of the problem and your rights. Call 1 866 981-5596 if you need help because of an accident.

2/23/2010
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

CA proposition 17 is not a good idea.

Read why California's proposition 17 will cost you more money for car insurance and is sponsored by a notoriously difficult carrier.

12/14/2009
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

When the rain comes, auto accidents are pictures of devastation.

Rainy season starts off with 500 Southern California accidents according to Huntington Beach Accident attorney. Here are pictures and Safety tips.

12/8/2009
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Fog kills 5.5% of those involved in an accident!

Careful as fog season rolls in. 5.5% of those involved in a fog related accident die of their injuries.

12/4/2009
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Seat belts were not used and did not save this 10 year old!

Seat belt use saves lives from wrongful death and great tragedy in auto accidents. This family did not listen and lost their 10 year old.

10/20/2009
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Toyota under fire again for unsafe seatbelts.


Toyota has recently been under fire for allegations of destroying and refusing to produce damaging evidence in rollover cases, as alleged by an attorney that use to represent the car maker.  Now they are under the gun for making seatbelts that according to a new lawsuit, are not safe.

The Toyota Corolla is one of the top selling cars in the U.S. today, with sales over 350,000 cars last year. However, due to defective seatbelts and door latches, a product liability suit was filed in Orange County Superior Court last week.

California personal injury attorneys for Elias Chico allege that he suffered severe injuries during his head on collision. During the accident in his 2005 Toyota Corolla, Chico lost control of his car and crashed head-on into another vehicle. Even though he was wearing a seatbelt, he was ejected through the right door of his car.
Chico suffered several injuries including traumatic brain injury, fractured legs, bruised lungs, and a skull fracture. Due to his extensive injuries, he has been unable to work and has required successive operations and other medical treatment.

Lawyers for Chico claim that it would have cost Toyota only $100 per vehicle to provide safer seatbelts that would not tear on impact. Did Toyota compromise safety over profits?  A jury will likely give us their response in about a year.

Pedestrian Accident

10/15/2009
Connie Gray
Comments (0)

Frightening facts: Halloween is a deadly night for pedestrians

Halloween is about ghosts and goblins, treats and dressing up.  It’s about being scared, but scared in a fun way. Unfortunately, Halloween can sometimes be a nightmare.  According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s (NHTSA)  Fatality Analysis Reporting Dataset, children are four times more likely to be killed in a pedestrian car accident between 4pm and 8pm on Halloween night than on any other day of the year.  
 
A hazardous combination of low visibility, children out after dark and adult drivers attending Halloween parties can too often prove fatal.  Nearly fifty-three percent of traffic fatalities on Halloween involve alcohol.  And, forty-five percent of all Halloween deaths involve a drunk driver.  This makes Halloween one of the deadliest nights of the year.
 
There are simple precautions that can help make Halloween safer.  Dress children in light-colored, reflective clothing and give them flashlights or glow sticks.  In the Los Angeles area, drivers are often in a hurry and impatient with pedestrians, so accompany your children while trick-or-treating.  Stay on the sidewalk, and only cross at well-lit cross-walks or intersections.  Click here for more Halloween Safety Tips.
 
If you are a driver, slow down and watch for children.  Pedestrians always have the right-of-way.
 
The pedestrian accident attorneys at Allen, Flatt, Ballidis and Leslie wish you a happy and safe Halloween.


Wrongful Death

2/23/2010
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Blue Cross quickly becoming the Toyota of bad business.

Blue Cross quickly becoming the Toyota of bad business. Personal Injury attorney James Ballidis discusses the continuing criminality of both.

General

2/26/2010
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Personal injury case: the number one question always asked

The first and almost universal question clients ask about a personal injury case is how long is it going to take. Here is an answer and explanation.

12/28/2009
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Holiday season safety tips.

Be safe this holiday season with these simple tips.

12/22/2009
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Blinds cause massive recall due to small child strangulation potential

Small children are at risk with these blind manufacturers calling for a massive recall.

11/24/2009
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Massive recall of cribs due to suffocation of children! Why so late?

The US Consumer Product Safety Commission recalled 1.2 million cribs because 4 deaths and 21 falls occurred by plastic part failure. Why take this long and allow such suffering?

11/23/2009
Connie Gray
Comments (0)

Pitbulls to be euthanized following dog bite attack

Three pitbulls that mauled a man in a Bakersfield back yard will be euthanized at the end of their 10-day quarantine period. Dog bites are a real danger and cause real injuries. If you or a loved one have sustained serious injuries from an attack by a dog, you may be eligible for compensation. We can help. Call Allen, Flatt, Ballidis and Leslie at 866-981-5596.

11/16/2009
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

This umbrella stroller is linked to fingertip amputation of children.

This umbrella stroller has the potential to amputate your toddlers fingers. Here is the information you need right away.

10/28/2009
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Robes are catching fire and causing severe injuries, recall is now in effect.


Nine women died when cooking with their robes on when it suddenly caught fire.  The fire spread so quickly that the victims never had a chance to remove the garments.  Finally Blair LLC has voluntarily recalled their full-length chenille robes and other chenille products due to their flammability problems. 

All nine deaths occurred before the April 2009 recall but since then other injuries have taken place. Burn injuries are among some of the most painful injuries to endure. In addition to the deaths there have been many moderate to severe burn injuries.

Effective immediately, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is advising women to discontinue wearing these dangerously flammable garments.  Blair products are mainly sold online and in catalogs, but they have a few stores as well. The recalled items include the chenille jacket, robe, lounge jacket and several tops. If you have purchased any of these products, return them to Blair to receive a $50 gift card for store credit. For further information you can visit the CPSC’s website at www.cpsc.gov.

We hope and pray for the families, and all victims should seek the assistance of a pwersonal injury or wrongful death attorney immediately. They have product liability claims.  If you know someone who nmeeds to find a quaalified attorney for these types of cases, we wrote an article on how to find a qualified wrongful death attorney.

10/20/2009
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

Cedar Sinai in California exposed patients to excessive radiation and then kept silent.


In a damning article in the Los Angeles Times on October 14, 2009, Cedar Sinai has been accused of giving a number of patients huge and excessive radiation doses which have caused serious consequences over the last 18 months.  To the 209 patients that have been exposed, there is now an investigation into why the technicians, trained to monitor the dose levels, simply allowed the exposure to continue.

This careless act will have grave implications for the 209 people, from hair loss and skin defects up through the more sad and devastating complexities of excessive radiation exposure like cancer, cell destruction and blood diseases. 

In medical malpractice, there are limitations on the amount of damages that can be assessed in a case such as this.  Medical malpractice provides these limitations as an effort at “tort reform.”  I have long pointed out that tort reform doesn’t work, because corporations need to feel the sting and bite of improper procedures.  The fact that this radiation dosage level was not checked for 18 months was indication of a lackadaisical attitude toward the care of patients, without any regard to the consequences of their future medical and personal history.  For these patients to endure a lifetime of trouble because of a simple mistake like this, repeated hundred of times, is just simply intolerable. 

What is worst, is that even after initial reports of hair loss by some patients, Cedar Sinai did not immediately investigate the matter, and further did not contact all of the patients until recently.  Now, because of adverse publicity and administrative oversight, they are conducting the “investigation.”  I’ll be curious to know how many patients continued to be improperly exposed after Cedar Sinai was first notified of the problem but before they conducted their “investigation.”

Whether it is a medical corporation or a business, they do not care about you and I, they care about profits.  Just like a driver text messaging and distracted that causes injury, these entities should pay for more than the medical bills and for the lifetime of damage that they have inflicted for their negligence.  Of course tort reformists will argue that the cost of insurance will rise if we remove these artificial barriers.  But the reality is that these people will either be compensated by the corporation that harmed them, or the public when they turn to socialized medicine for their care.  In either case, we are going to pay for it, it just seems it would be more appropriate to have the entity that was responsible pay more.


10/15/2009
James E. Ballidis
Comments (0)

A claim that paramedics did not properly care for heart attack victim is denied as California statute requires a claim be filed within 6 months.


An Orange County woman, Christine Palmer has filed a claim against the city of Huntington Beach for negligence of the paramedics during an emergency.

The incident happened last year when Mrs. Palmer called 9-1-1 when her husband was experiencing extreme chest pain, labored breathing and numbness in his arm. Even though these were typical heart attack symptoms, the paramedics did not suspect a heart attack.  Her husband was transported to the local hospital in an ambulance and without a paramedic.  Should they have suspected heart failure or other similar maladies?
During the drive Mr. Palmer went into a grand mal seizure and had no pulse when he arrived at the hospital.  The hospital ER team tried to revive him but could not.

Huntington Beach officials are currently investigating this case but Mrs. Palmer‘s attorney filed the claim two months past the 6 month city deadline. It is unclear whether the claim will proceed forward, because you must file a claim against a public entity, even if medical negligence cases, within 6 months, except in certain circumstances.
If you have been injured in an accident and  feel some governmental agency is at fault, please contact a qualified and experienced California personal injury attorney immediately.  You may be precluded from pursuing your claim if you wait.

Call us, we would be happy to speak to you for free.  Call 1 866 981-5596 or contact us via email.  We can help.


Southern California Injury Law Blog

    Last week an Orange County jury awarded $3.1 million to a woman who suffered a medication overdose at a skilled nursing home that left her brain damaged. Barbara Lefforge, only 57 years old was sent to St. Edna’s center for rehabilitation after a tendon repair surgery. She had only been there 5 ½ hours when the medication error occurred, explained an Orange County injury attorney.

    According to court records, after her surgery her doctor recommended that she stay at St. Edna’s skilled nursing facility until she recuperated. She was mistakenly given 50mg of morphine instead of 50mg of Demerol. Since this was such an excessive dose, Lefforge’s attorney argued that medical personnel should have questioned that dosage order. Moreover the staff pharmacist even warned that the dosage was too high, but Lefforge’s doctor had doubled it, so she was given that quantity of medication.

    Lefforge was left unmonitored until the next morning when she was found barely breathing due to the medication error. She had suffered from a major overdose of morphine. After being taken to the hospital, it was established that she had suffered a brain injury from the excessive morphine dose.

    St. Edna Rehabilitation Center is one of 25 California rehab facilities owned by Covenant Care. Since 2004, they have accepted more than $880 million in additional compensation from the state for increased wages and staffing. According to the non-profit group, “California Watch”, it found that many Covenant Care facilities actually reduced their staff and let nursing ratios go below state standards during this time.

    Tragically this is not an isolated case. Nearly one in five dosing orders of all nursing homes and hospitals has medication errors. These odds are unacceptable. In many cases, these patients are there for short stays while rehabilitating, not lifelong residents. It is for this reason that every citizen should have an up-to-date medical directive.

    Only about 20% of Americans have a medical directive document; however, explained an Orange County injury attorney, it is one of the most important documents a person can have. The Advanced Health Care Directive is the best way to make known your health care wishes if you are incapacitated and can’t communicate your wishes.

    Unfortunately, just telling your wishes to your husband or wife does not automatically ensure that they will be honored. Here in California, the law gives you two options for your directive: you can either appoint another person who can make the decisions for you or you can make your desires known through writing your own advanced directive. Either way, it’s important to meet with a professional lawyer to discuss your legal options.

    If you have a loved one in any type of nursing facility, it would be wise to double-check that their medical directive matches the instructions that the staff has. If you have any questions or concerns regarding a nursing home in California, visit www.nursinghomeguide.org/ for a complete listing by city or county of local elder facilities and their violations, staffing policies, and complaints.

    James Ballidis is an Orange County injury attorney specializing in injury claims arising from medical malpractice and medication errors, subjects on which he has written extensively. To request a copy of one of his articles or to discuss your rights and options after an accident, feel free to call 866-981-5596.


    High prices at the pump, warns an Orange County injury lawyer, are not the only thing California residents should be concerned about at Southland gas stations: in the past few months, defective spray nozzles have caused several injuries throughout the state, including one serious enough to require hospitalization.

    The state fire marshal is warning all California residents to the possible spray hazard of the VST made nozzle and has issued a directive to thousands of service station operators to remove the 30,000 “open hold” latches that are in question. These latches are convenient due to the fact that you can go wash your windows at the same time the latch allows the pump to run without you holding it. This will affect approximately one-third of all California service stations.

    Just last month there were accidents here in Orange County as well, in both Huntington Beach and Santa Ana, according to an Orange County injury lawyer. In fact half of all the incidences have been in Southland. The accidents are under investigation and the latches are being removed as a safety precaution until the results of an inquiry into the defective spray nozzles.

    The California state fire marshal cited that this is “a hazard to the public and welfare”. Besides the obvious safety issues of gasoline that is being spraying onto your face and eyes, there is a real fire danger as well. Most Service station owner, obviously concerned for the customer’s safety and possible liability issue, are removing the latches immediately.

    Daniel Berlant from the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection is setting up mandates for Service station owners to be complied with by Oct 15, 2010 They have the option to:
    • Possibly revert back to employee pumping only
    • Removing the convenience of paying at the pump, going inside to pay
    • Remove all latches from the VST nozzles

    One additional warning is to never put another object like a bottle or can to hold the nozzle in your tank. This could unfortunately cause the same problem.

    Currently the deadline to remove all of the latches is required by October 15th. If you still encounter a gas station that has not removed the latch, an Orange County injury lawyer advises that you utilize these safety precautions to avoid an injury.

    Since most accident are occurring once you have picked up the nozzle and then push your selection for type of fuel, experts are suggesting that you put the nozzle into the tank hole before you select the grade of gasoline. This will prevent most of the spray accidents. However, if the latch is still attached to the nozzle, there is still some danger of getting sprayed when you remove it. To be on the safe side for now, try to use only nozzle pumps with no latches attached.

    After Oct. 15th, gas stations that have not complied with this order will be shut down.

    James Ballidis is an Orange County injury lawyer specializing in injury claims arising from accidents resulting from defective products and manufacturer negligence. He has written numerous articles on subjects relevant to personal injury law. To request a copy of one of his books or articles, or to discuss a specific case, feel free to call 866-981-5596.


    A family of three was killed recently when a runaway truck smashed into their home in central California. The truck driver was driving along state highway 154 in Santa Barbara and while merging his truck onto State Street, his brakes suddenly failed. He then proceeded to hit several parked cars and go over an embankment and finally hit the occupied home that had a young family living there, explains a California injury lawyer.

    As the California Highway Patrol crash investigation team tries to reconstruct this accident, they did comment that alcohol was not a factor but that brake failure is suspected. The driver admitted that that the brakes were not working correctly when he picked up his load in Santa Ynez. The driver attempted to use all brake resources available; both hand and foot brakes but nothing could stop this truck.

    Although many truck accident fatalities are caused by driver fatigue, a recent Department of Transportation (DOT) report found that 29.4% of large truck crashes occur due to brake failure. Another common truck accident cause is tire blowout due to worn tires or trucks not loaded properly.

    When brakes malfunction and the driver’s behavior causes serious personal injury or in this case, wrongful death, who do you blame? Should the driver have fixed the issue instead of proceeding with his schedule? Was there a mechanical problem? Had maintenance been overlooked due to budget cut-backs and busy schedules? Was the mandatory brake pre-brake inspection performed?

    Hiring the right California injury lawyer for counsel is advisable when you are struggling with specific truck industry issues and laws.

    The trucking industry is a powerful organization; generating revenues of $610 billion per year, a figure that is set to double by 2015. Commercial trucking is here to stay but that means more cars must share the nation’s roads with even more trucks. Currently, one in eight traffic fatalities involve a trucking collision.

    California is second only to Texas—which has the highest rate—in the number of truck fatalities that occur in the state each year. Investigations reveal that the primary causes of most truck accidents are fatigue and lack of sleep. In fact another runaway truck crash occurred in Northern California earlier this month and killed an innocent man. The CHP is still investigating with The Department of Transportation, DOT. Currently, they are investigating around 20 similar cases.

    Clearly this is a situation that is not going away and needs to be resolved before more innocent people are tragically killed. Our thoughts and prayers are with the surviving relatives of these truck fatalities.

    James Ballidis is a California injury lawyer specializing in truck accidents. He has written numerous articles on trucking accidents. To request a copy of one of his articles or to discuss a specific case, feel free to call 866-981-5596.


Bookmark and Share


Free Book

Contact

Name:

Phone:

Email:

Tell us more:



4400 MacArthur Blvd.
Suite 370
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Phone: 949-752-7474
Fax: 949-752-1645

Get Directions

Video Library

FAQs

Web Resources